http://onlinecasino.webeden.co.uk

Public colleges lay in the hands of Brown’s proposal

By: Agnessa Kasumyan

With the economic downturn, community colleges across California have suffered due to funding cuts. Glendale Community College (GCC) has already taken difficult measures to continue providing an adequate education for its student population, including cutting the winter session.

The lack of funding has also resulted in many difficulties for students. Traditionally, students at GCC plan to transfer to a four-year university after two years; however, many students are now looking at an additional year of community college due to many classes having been cut. The winter session has already been eliminated from the program, and although the college decided to keep summer courses this year, only around 160 classes in comparison to the 280 classes that are usually available will be offered this summer.

Many students also have difficulty acquiring the classes they need due to the increased enrollment at the college. This is in part due to a surge of the unemployed returning to community college in order to acquire a degree for a better job or train in a different field of work.

“Students are concerned at how they will be able to compete for their classes because enrollment is inversely proportionate to unemployment,” executive Vice President of Administrative Services Ron Nakasone said. “The increased enrollment, however, does help with the budget because we are funded based on enrollment.”

According to Nakasone, the college is undergoing a “hiring free zone,” which means there will be no opportunity for students to work on campus, and managers have agreed to take a five percent pay cut. Furthermore, the college wants to give professors “incentives to retire,” and already have 31 retirees for June.

Nakasone believes that although the college will need several years to recuperate if Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget proposal is approved, it would offer relief for community colleges. The budget proposal includes $12 billion in tax extensions, which would continue increased taxes on incomes, purchases, and vehicles that would protect school funding. If the extensions are passed, GCC alone would lose $3.7 million in funding; however, if voters veto the taxes, the college would face $10.7 million in cuts. In whole, California community colleges would be faced with $800 million cut from their budget.

According to Azadui Kalaydjian, a freshman at GCC, she has had to extend her transfer date to a four-year university because many of the classes she needed to take for nursing were cut from the summer and winter sessions.

“It’s not just me,” Kalaydjian said. “A lot of students are crestfallen that they can’t transfer to their dream schools as soon as they would like, but it’s pushing a lot of us to study harder because we know we have no room to make mistakes.”

UC schools are also facing funding threats if the tax extensions in Brown’s proposal are not approved. Due to an eight percent increase in tuition, undergraduates will have to pay around $11, 100 for their schooling, not including boarding costs. Students also face the possibility of an additional 32% increase in the middle of the year, which would boost tuition to $14,800 a year.

With $6.6 billion having emerged in state revenues, the likelihood of Brown’s budget proposal being passed is slim. Although the revenues will help the state’s budget, half of the money will go to elementary and high schools. UC’s and Cal State’s, however, will not receive any aid aside from tax increases.

Due to such rigid financial conditions, UC president Mark G. Yudof hopes to amplify their financial aid programs to provide more relief for students from middle income families. Students with family incomes of up to $80,000 can receive financial aid through federal taxes in addition to federal and state aid.

Pending lawsuit may mean no lockers starting next year

Photo Credit: Cain Buckler

By: Megan Knight

Remember those dorky rolling backpacks in elementary school? This upcoming school year, it may be a good idea to invest in a new one.

Depending on a decision from the district lawyers as well as pending passage of Assembly Bill 165, the administration will determine by the end of June whether or not lockers will be available for use.

“We think we’re heading in the direction of not having lockers,” Assistant Principal Caroline Sweeney said.

Due to a recent state law stipulating a “free” education without imposing fees, the school may not be able to charge locker fees starting next year.

However, the administration is questioning whether the law applies to locker fees because lockers are a luxury, not a necessity for a free education.

“I walk home so [not having lockers] would be a hassle and [aggregates] my back problems,” Juliana Ter-Haroutunian (’13) said.

The $35 locker fee covers the cost to fix and paint the lockers as well as funding sports and extracurricular programs.

According to Athletic Director Jack Van Patten, if locker fees are no longer charged, the athletic program may cut down on games and teams such as the frosh-soph or junior varsity teams depending on how grave the situation is.

“We’ll have to find other ways to fund,” Van Patten said.

The state enforced the new law after settling the Doe v. State of California lawsuit last December. The lawsuit, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) last September, alleged that over 30 districts that required students to pay for basic supplies violated the California Constitution.

The original debate started 27 years ago with the Hartzell v. Connell case, and was brought back to attention last year after a parent in Orange County told the ACLU about how a teacher criticized her son for purchasing supplies cheaper than those assigned.

The adminstration is planning a community meeting to inform parents about the lawsuit.

Hoover and Daily collaborate to paint mural

Photo Credit: Allen Au

By: Megan Knight

Earlier this year, Principal Jennifer Earl, art teacher Mary Anna Pomonis, Daily High art teacher Emily Goff, and professional muralist Roger Dolin discussed various ideas on a collaborative project with Daily High School to create a work of art to beautify the school. Together, they agreed to create a mural titled, “Art is the Heart of the Community.”

The students are painting in panels at Daily, which will eventually be arranged together as one enormous masterpiece.

At approximately 10 feet tall and 30 feet across, the mural is to be placed on the second floor, overlooking the quad. By mid-June, most of the mural will be completed, with installation occurring over the summer.

“We’re working on some of the designs [Hoover] gave us,” said Daily student Juan Carlos (’12). “We’re like a team.”

Designing began in the middle of March, and at the Block Party a colorful concept of the mural was on display. Students from the VAPA club provided rough ideas for Daily’s design class that works on the mural every day with Goff.

Other students from both schools work after school on Tuesdays and Thursdays with Dolin for community service hours.

“It has been wonderful to have [Hoover] students visit our campus and paint with us,” Goff said. “Art really does bring people together.”

Keep lockers open

By: Megan Knight

The school is leaning towards a decision of not having lockers for next year, a decision that will anger many, if not all, students.

This is due to a recent court ruling prohibiting public schools from charging students for anything as it technically does not constitute a free public education.
The locker fee is $35, and on top of that, students have to buy a special lock that costs $20.

If there are no more lockers, students are going to be obligated to carry all of their books to and from school every single day. This will surely be a burden for many who will have to carry heavy science and math books.

Some may say that this is just a manifestation of teenage laziness, but not having lockers and carrying books as heavy as dumbbells on our backs is too much.

There is no possible way, financially speaking, for the school to afford to buy class sets of books considering that some books cost $120 each.

However, what is wrong with the school charging fees for lockers as it is a voluntary decision? We were never forced into purchasing lockers during registration, and we paid according to our discretion.

If students cannot afford the fees, they can always apply for a fee waiver or choose not to use a locker at all.

The money collected is used to improve school facilities like the conditions of the lockers.

Also, with the district facing budgetary problems, is it logical for the school to spend money on removing lockers from the school?

It is just an unnecessary problem that should not even be a problem at all. It is not a question of a legality, it is a form of necessity.

Yes, we need lockers. No, there is no exception.

Do you like our new website layout?

  • Hell Yes (67%, 14 Votes)
  • Yes (33%, 7 Votes)

Total Voters: 21

Loading ... Loading ...
Photobucket
Photobucket